Conflict is "a process that
begins when someone perceives that someone else has negatively affected, or is
about to negatively affect, something that the first person cares about" (O'Rourke, 2010, p. 298). Conflict is never an easy thing to
deal with. However, it is a natural part
of life and therefore, must be managed.
Imagining that I am a department
manager in a mid-sized company that provides technology support services, I
have ten employees who are required to maintain a high level of technical
expertise and deliver excellent customer service. However, one of my employees, who has been
with the company for two years, is performing at a substandard level and I have
received numerous complaints from customers and coworkers. In addition, this employee has displayed
confrontational behavior that has created a hostile environment. I must now meet with this employee and
deliver an ultimatum regarding the need for immediate improvement or dismissal.
According to James O'Rourke, author
of Management Communication, there are certain things you can do to wisely
manage conflict. In approaching my
employee, I would certainly follow his advice.
O'Rourke says that it is important to "keep your own emotions
neutral" (O'Rourke, 2010, p. 304) When speaking to an employee regarding their
behavior, it is best to "communicate continually and frankly" (O'Rourke, 2010, p. 304) It is important to speak to the other person
with respect, yet in a very straight forward way. There must be no doubt as to your meaning
after the conversation.
In addition, be prepared to
follow-up with the employee. If changes
are made and the employee complies with the request, then nothing else needs to
be said on the subject. However, if he
does not, then you must be prepared to follow through with what you say. I have also learned that when speaking to an
employee regarding any negative issue, such as reprimanding, firing, or a job
demotion, it is always a good idea to have another member of the management
staff there as well. This provides a
witness and prevents the mishandling of the situation. It also ensures that you cannot later be
accused of handling the situation incorrectly.
In anticipating the employee's
reaction, I would first have to consider the individual. Since he has already been displaying a
confrontational behavior that has created a hostile environment, it seems very
likely that he would continue to do so once confronted. I think it is best to expect the worse and
hope for the best in this situation.
That does not mean to go into the meeting with a negative attitude, but
to be prepared in case the employee does not take to well to being spoken to on
the issue. As O'Rourke also points out,
sometimes it is best to "know when to cut your losses" (O'Rourke,
2010, p. 305).
There
are several techniques that may be needed in this situation. First, I need to be prepared to break the
cycle of escalation. I need to address
my employee with "nonjudgemental description, problem orientation,
empathy, equality, and provisionalism"
(Abigail & Cahn, 2011, p. 114).
I also think letting my employee know that I value them, both as a
person and an employee is important. The
idea is not to make them feel devalued, but rather to make them understand that
their contribution to the organization is important. However, they must also understand that in
order for them to remain valuable they need to behave in a way that is
appropriate.
I hope that by addressing this employee in a frank,
respectful, and nonjudgmental way, I can get my point across. Ideally, that would be the end of the
conflict. However, knowing that
tactfully and effectively addressing him may still result in anger. I must still be prepared to follow through on
my ultimatum.
Abigail, R. A.,
& Cahn, D. D. (2011). Managing Conflict Through Communication (4
ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
O'Rourke, J. S.
(2010). MJanagement Communication, A Case-Analysis Approach. Upper
Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
No comments:
Post a Comment